With the publication of the IIQ 2019 valuations by 8 BDCs with $107mn in various forms of debt exposure (2022-2024 and both senior and second lien), we’ve added Constellis Holdings to our under-performers list with an initial rating of CCR 3 (Watch List). The debt has been discounted between (6%-30%) from 0% to (5%) in the prior quarter.
This is not surprising as there has been a massive number of changes in senior management in recent months and downgrades from both S&P and Moody’s in the spring, worried about high leverage; cash flow losses and operational challenges. For the BDC sector, this is very big exposure in aggregate, with annual income of approx. $9mn at risk should the company default down the road. With that said $90mn of the debt is held by the three FS-KKR non traded BDCs (FS II-III and IV), which are intending to go public under one banner before long. How Constellis plays out will be of above average interest at FS Investment-KKR in the quarters ahead.
Bedding manufacturer Hollander Sleep Products is under bankruptcy court protection since May, but seeking to get its plan approved and to return to a normal, but less leveraged status. On July 22, 2019 the company “sought a court order … approving a settlement with unsecured creditors that revises its restructuring support agreement and marks an important step toward the maker of bedding products emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy”.
There are two sister BDCs with $34mn of exposure to Hollander: PennantPark Floating Rate (PFLT) and PennantPark Investment (PNNT). Most of that exposure is in pre-petition debt and on non accrual. (There is also $3.7mn of DIP financing paying interest currently). At June 2019, the Pennants had discounted the old debt by (53%), up from (13%) after the debt first became non performing. That suggests realized losses – when Chapter 11 exit does likely occur in the IVQ – will exceed ($20mn) and leave the two BDCs with over $2.0mn a year in lower investment income. What the new capital structure of Hollander will look like; whether there will be a debt for equity swap and what the role of the two BDCs will be we’ll leave for a future post as the dust settles.
Arthur Penn – CEO of both BDCs- did address the subject of Hollander on the latest PNNT Conference Call on August 8, 2019. He made clear PNNT/PFLT were not leading the debt discussions, He said there were “stalking horse” bids, but did not seem confident what the ultimate value of the company might be in the marketplace. That leaves open the possibility that the value at June 30, 2019 may yet materially drop further, making a bad situation worse for both PFLT and PPNT.
Law360 reports that a bankruptcy judge approved the sale of 15 hospitals for $34mn by LifeCare Holdings. That brings ever closer the resolution – and likely liquidation – of the long term care chain, which filed for Chapter 11 in May, 2019. The company has been on the BDC Credit Reporter’s Bankruptcy List, but may get removed shortly.
The only BDC with exposure is PennantPark Floating Rate (PFLT), with $4.6mn at cost, written down to just $0.758mn at June 2019 and on non accrual since the IQ 2019. Presumably, the latest valuation was based on the likely proceeds from the proposed sale, so no great increase in what PFLT might receive at the end of the day is expected. The worrisome element here from a PFLT perspective is not the size of the investment – which was small, nor the minimal of income lost, but the likely severe discount of proceeds from the cost basis, despite a “first lien secured debt” status: (84%). Investors expect recovery rates on failed loans will be substantially higher for senior debt, and makes us worry about the prospects for other loans of PFLT- and similar BDC lenders – when defaults occur.
Since the BDC Credit Reporter first warned of a possible Chapter 11 at Empire Resorts, owned by Montreign Operating Company, we’ve learned more. One of its BDC lenders – PennantPark Floating Rate (PFLT) – simultaneously wrote its senior debt down and predicted no loss would occur on its IIQ 2019 Conference Call. We also read a news article from a trade publication providing further information about the roughly $0.5bn in debt outstanding that might be in need of a haircut or restructuring. All this was included in the Company File we keep on every under-performing business, which we’ve updated. Our view of the likelihood of loss – PFLT’s optimism notwithstanding – has increased.
Resorts World Catskills is owned and operated by Montreign Operating Company, LLC, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Empire Resorts, Inc., a gaming and entertainment corporation which has operated in the Catskills since 1993. On August 9, Empire Resorts, stung by heavy losses from under-performance at its facility, raised the possibility of a voluntary Chapter 11 filing.
As a result, we’ve reduced the company’s Corporate Credit Rating from CCR 3 to CCR 4- Worry List. There are 3 BDCs – all in the senior debt with $67mn at cost outstanding: PennantPark Floating Rate (PFLT), CM Finance (CMFN) and Business Development Corporation of America (BDCA). Most recently PFLT discounted its debt by (18%), but that may prove too conservative if Chapter 11 occurs. The other two BDCs- whose valuations dates back to March – have discounts of (8%) and (9%), and are likely to be taking bigger reserves for loss when their second quarter results come out.
Affinion Group Holdings, and several of its subsidiaries, have completed yet another recapitalization of the highly leveraged company. We’ve used the opportunity to update the Company Profile page which provides a summary of all prior restructurings and evolving BDC exposure. Speaking of the latter, the only remaining exposure is by Pennant Park (PNNT) and PennantPark Floating (PFLT), which has $46mn invested in the equity at cost and which was valued at $18mn at year end 2018. The BDCs relationship with the Company goes back more than a decade and – as the Company Profile page shows – there have been many twists and turns along the way. This is unlikely to be the last. In the short run, we expect the recapitalization will reduce the BDCs investment valuation, but the trend may reverse in the future depending on the performance of the Company. On the other hand, the equity could be fully written off one day. This is just a snapshot.